The main differences between argon-filled and non-argon-filled insulated glass are as follows:
Thermal insulation performance: Argonfilled insulated glass has better thermal insulation performance because the thermal conductivity of argon is lower than that of air, which can significantly reduce the heat transfer coefficient and effectively block transfer.
Sound insulation effect: Argon-filled insulated glass has a better sound insulation effect, with sound insulation performance 30% better than that of non- glass.
Anti-fogging and condensation: No fogging or condensation will occur inside argon-filled insulated glass, whereas non-filled insulated glass is prone to problems.
Glass stability: The density of argon is greater than that of air, which can increase the resistance to air movement, reduce convection inside the glass, thereby the wind pressure resistance of the glass and preventing the self-suction phenomenon of the glass.
Cost: Argon-filled insulated glass has a higher cost because argon a relatively expensive gas, making it more costly compared to insulated glass filled with air.
Service life: Argon filling helps delay the occurrence of air leakage, helping to the service life of the insulated glass.
In summary, argon-filled insulated glass performs better in terms of thermal insulation, sound insulation, anti-fogging and glass stability, but the cost is also higher. Whether to fill with argon should be comprehensively considered based on the specific usage environment and performance requirements
0 comments